Silver Book Fact

Every $1 spent on technological innovations in heart attack care has produced an estimated $7 gain.

Cutler, David M. and Mark McClellan. Is Technological Change in Medicine Worth It?. Health Affairs. 2001; 20(5): 11-29. http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/20/5/11.full

Reference

Title
Is Technological Change in Medicine Worth It?
Publication
Health Affairs
Publication Date
2001
Authors
Cutler, David M. and Mark McClellan
Volume & Issue
Volume 20, Issue 5
Pages
11-29
URL
Read Full Resource

Categories

  • Innovative Medical Research
  • Economic Value

Related Facts

  • Survival Rates of SAS Patients with and without SAVR
    Patients with severe aortic stenosis (SAS) ages 80+ who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) have 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival rates of 87%, 78%, and 68% respectively — compared with…  
  • A major objective is to control blood pressure and preempt primary and secondary stroke. Assessing specific antihypertensive therapies will identify specific treatments that will lower blood pressure.  
  • About 1/2 of the decrease in recent deaths in cardiovascular disease can be attributed to medical treatment.  
  • Greater use of clot-busting drug t-PA in ischemic stroke patients could save the health care system over $100 million a year.  
  • Cost-savings associated with optimal anticoagulation in AFib patients
    If half of all atrial fibrillation patients receiving suboptimal or no anticoagulation instead received optimal anticoagulation, 28,000 strokes could be prevented each year at a savings of around $2.5 billion in direct…