Silver Book Fact

Cost-effectiveness of SAVR

The cost-effectiveness ratio for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), compared to no surgery, was estimated at $13,528 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) (~$17,225 in 2017 dollars).

Wu Y, Jin R, Gao G, Grunkmeier G, Starr A. Cost-Effectiveness of Aortic Valve Replacement in the Elderly: An introductory story. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007; 133(3): 608-13. http://www.jtcvsonline.org/article/S0022-5223(06)02087-3/fulltext

Reference

Title
Cost-Effectiveness of Aortic Valve Replacement in the Elderly: An introductory story
Publication
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Publication Date
2007
Authors
Wu Y, Jin R, Gao G, Grunkmeier G, Starr A
Volume & Issue
Volume 133, Issue 3
Pages
608-13
URL
Read Full Resource

Categories

  • Innovative Medical Research
  • Economic Value

Related Facts

  • TAVR v. SAVR in Intermediate-Risk SAS Patients
    At 1-year, severe aortic stenosis (SAS) patients with intermediate surgical mortality risk who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), had all-cause mortality rates of 7.4% (compared to 13% for surgical…  
  • Satisfaction with HVD Treatment
    Among treated heart valve disease (HVD), 96% express “full satisfaction” and 78% are “very satisfied” with their treatment.  
  • In 2010, ~67,500 SAVRs were performed in the U.S.
     
  • Cost-effectiveness of SAVR
    The cost-effectiveness ratio for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), compared to no surgery, was estimated at $13,528 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) (~$17,225 in 2017 dollars).  
  • Survival Rates of SAS Patients with and without SAVR
    Patients with severe aortic stenosis (SAS) ages 80+ who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) have 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival rates of 87%, 78%, and 68% respectively — compared with…